Up Arrow
 
Question Icon
 

Select an option from the dropdown list and press GO

 
Question Icon
 

Select an option from the dropdown list and then press GO

 
 
 

1987

Information Icon Water Mark
Up Arrow

Add to Binder allows you to add Workplace Relations content to your personal binder for viewing or printing later.

Binder icon image Binder

To access your binder, click the Binder link at the top of the page.

 
 

LCR11349

Labour Court Database

__________________________________________________________________________________

File Number: CD87538

Case Number: LCR11349

Section / Act: S67

Parties: GOULDINGS CHEMICALS LTD - and - ITGWU

Subject:
Severance payments.

Recommendation:
3. The Court has considered the submissions made by the parties.
It is satisfied that in order to ensure the continued operation of
the plant in Cork an early and positive decision on the Company's
proposals is required. The Court is further satisfied that terms
such as those suggested by the Union are beyond the means of the
Company to meet.

In these circumstances, therefore, the Court recommends that the
Company should agree to amend its proposals to provide #375 per
year of service where appropriate and that the proposals so
amended should be accepted by the workers concerned.

Division: Mr O'Connell Mr McHenry Mr O'Murchu

Text of Document__________________________________________________________________

CD87538 THE LABOUR COURT LCR11349
CC871019 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACTS, 1946 TO 1976
RECOMMENDATION NO. 11349


Parties: GOULDINGS CHEMICALS LTD
(Represented by the Federated Union of Employers)

and

IRISH TRANSPORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION

Subject:

1. Severance payments.

Background:

2. With reference to the Court hearing held on the 16th July,
1987 the Court recommends as follows:

Recommendation:

3. The Court has considered the submissions made by the parties.
It is satisfied that in order to ensure the continued operation of
the plant in Cork an early and positive decision on the Company's
proposals is required. The Court is further satisfied that terms
such as those suggested by the Union are beyond the means of the
Company to meet.

In these circumstances, therefore, the Court recommends that the
Company should agree to amend its proposals to provide #375 per
year of service where appropriate and that the proposals so
amended should be accepted by the workers concerned.
~
Signed on behalf of the Labour Court

30th July, 1987 ---------------
DH/PG John O'Connell
Deputy Chairman



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Share this page

 
logo-sml
Links|About the Reform Programme|Accessibility|Privacy Policy|Disclaimer|Sitemap

Registered Address: Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation, O'Brien Road, Carlow