Up Arrow
 
Question Icon
 

Select an option from the dropdown list and press GO

 
Question Icon
 

Select an option from the dropdown list and then press GO

 
 
 

1988

Information Icon Water Mark
Up Arrow

Add to Binder allows you to add Workplace Relations content to your personal binder for viewing or printing later.

Binder icon image Binder

To access your binder, click the Binder link at the top of the page.

 
 

LCR11664

Labour Court Database

__________________________________________________________________________________

File Number: CD8832

Case Number: LCR11664

Section / Act: S67

Parties: LEVER BROTHERS (IRELAND) LIMITED - and - MARINE PORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION

Subject:
(a) Employee's right to transfer under the 1984 Agreement. (b) Rentention of Personal Product Advertising Store in Tallaght.

Recommendation:
3. The Court considers that the compulsory transfer of the
claimant to the North Wall was contrary to the spirit and intent
of existing agreements and understandings and the Court therefore
recommends that he be re-instated in his former job in Tallaght if
he so wishes. Alternatively he should be offered compensation of
#1,000 to accept the transfer.

The Court does not recommend concession of the claim for the
retention of the Personal Product Advertising Store.

Division: CHAIRMAN Mr Collins Mr Walsh

Text of Document__________________________________________________________________

CD8832 RECOMMENDATION NO. LCR11664

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACTS, 1946 TO 1976
SECTION 67


PARTIES: LEVER BROTHERS (IRELAND) LIMITED
(Represented by the Federated Union of Employers)
and
MARINE PORT AND GENERAL WORKERS' UNION



SUBJECT:
1. (a) Employee's right to transfer under the 1984 Agreement.

(b) Rentention of Personal Product Advertising Store in
Tallaght.

BACKGROUND:
2. Following a Labour Court investigation into this dispute on
the 21st January, 1988, the Court recommends as follows:-

RECOMMENDATION:

3. The Court considers that the compulsory transfer of the
claimant to the North Wall was contrary to the spirit and intent
of existing agreements and understandings and the Court therefore
recommends that he be re-instated in his former job in Tallaght if
he so wishes. Alternatively he should be offered compensation of
#1,000 to accept the transfer.

The Court does not recommend concession of the claim for the
retention of the Personal Product Advertising Store.
~

Signed on behalf of the Labour Court

John M Horgan
28th January, 1988 ------------------
D.H./U.S. Chairman



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Share this page

 
logo-sml
Links|About the Reform Programme|Accessibility|Privacy Policy|Disclaimer|Sitemap

Registered Address: Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation, O'Brien Road, Carlow